![]() |
| HOME | REVIEWS & RATINGS | BEST & WORST | FAQ | CONTACT | LINKS | FUN STUFF | POSTERS | DVDs |
| "Survey says...." Click here! And put in your two cents worth! |
|
THANK GOD MY RENTAL WAS FREE It turns out I should have rented something else. Sometimes, even a lower-than-average movie can be enjoyed if one has very low expectations of it. Mine weren't low enough to enjoy this feature-debut from director Joseph McGinty Nichol (a.k.a. "McG"). BIGGER ISN'T ALWAYS BETTER
INFLUENCE OR OUTRIGHT COPY? The "Matrix"-style fights have no place in Charlie's Angels. The reason why the characters in The Matrix could do these stunts was because they were living in a DREAM WORLD! Such is not the case with the angels. There was only one scene with a Matrix-like effect that was downright awesome and that is the "magic bullet" scene, where we follow a bullet in slow motion on its way to one of the angels. Another outright copy is the "Mission: Impossible"-style computer room. While I command the imagination of the artistic director and the set decorator, they should do a serious reality check, as there probably doesn't exist a single mainframe computer room as ridiculous as the one featured in the movie. That set would have been perfect for a movie like Batman, where we're dealing with a fantasy world, but it just doesn't fit in Angels.
TOM AND TIM STEAL THE SHOW In contrast, the worst scene of the movie has to be the race car chase through the city streets. Not only does it not fit with the rest of the movie, but the editing of that scene is just atrocious, with cameras changing every .5 second! Like much of the movie, this scene feels "tacked on". Oh, you want a car chase? Let me add one in, even though it won't make any sense (the driver of the car being chased by the angels is none other the hired killer they are pursuing ...right.)
Let's change subjects for a while and talk about the actors. When I first heard that they were making this movie, I was somewhat puzzled when they announced that Bill Murray would be in it. I like Murray, but action movies are not really his forte, and yet, he managed to deliver a strong performance that is a mix of serious acting and comedy. THE ANGELS: ADEQUATE AT BEST
The worst was Drew Barrymore (E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial, Scream, The Wedding Singer). Her performance was sub-par, but I suspect it has more to do with bad dialogue than bad acting, such as the scene where she's naming figures while fighting: "and that was 'Kicking your ass'". Finally Cameron Diaz (Being John Malkovich, There's Something About Mary, My Best Friend's Wedding) does okay, but I think that if the casting directors wanted a bad-ass tall blonde, they should have gone with Charlize Theron (The Cider House Rules, The Devil's Advocate, That Thing You Do!). Anyone who has seen Theron as "Helga Svelgen" in her 1996 debut in 2 Days in the Valley knows what I'm talking about. She only has a few lines of dialogue, but she played a mean sexy killing machine.
SOME THINGS WERE EYE-PLEASING... ...OTHERS WERE NOT
MY COMMENTS FOR MCG One: a soundtrack is supposed to be coherent and support the movie. Some songs were totally out of place/time (such as Deee-Lite's "Groove Is In The Heart") and some were overtaking the movie (Blur's "Song 2", Prodigy's "Smack My Bitch Up"). Two: there is a difference between being sexy and just showing cleavage. Throughout the movie, I kept expecting the actresses' breasts to be used as weapons, since they were shown in so many scenes. I said it before and I'll say it again: just because you can doesn't mean you should. Reviewed on May 19, 2001 |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ABOUT MOVIECRITIC.CA | AWARDS | FAQ | CONTACT US | PRIVACY POLICY | USER SURVEY |
|
This page was last updated on: Sunday, 21-Mar-2004 16:23:05 CST © 1998-2004 Luc-Rock Paquin. All Rights Reserved. All movie images © by their respective owners. Used with permission. Before "borrowing" something from my site, please ask me. "Reel Canadian Movie Critic" logo by FranclyGraphic.com. |